About this experiment
Map three different atomic properties on a periodic arrangement. Select and compare elements, then filter a period or group to discover broad trends and meaningful exceptions.
Learning goals
- Compare trends across a period and down a group.
- Distinguish covalent radius from an exact boundary of an atom.
- Treat unassigned electronegativity as missing data rather than zero.
How to use it
- 1Compare lithium, beryllium and boron using radius and ionisation energy.
- 2Filter period two and identify the oxygen-nitrogen ionisation-energy exception.
- 3Compare sodium with potassium in group one.
- 4Choose a noble gas on the electronegativity map and interpret the missing value.
The model
Assumptions
- Only atomic numbers 1 through 20 are included. Values are fixed reference data, not predictions from an electronic-structure solver.
- Radii use the Cordero 2008 covalent-radius definition in picometres; ionisation energies use NIST values in electronvolts. Pauling electronegativity is dimensionless.
- Noble-gas Pauling entries are unassigned. Trace lines guide the eye between discrete elements and do not imply interpolated measurements.
Try this in class
- Q1Why is the first ionisation energy of boron lower than that of beryllium?
- Q2Why is a noble-gas electronegativity gap not evidence of zero attraction for electrons?
Frequently asked questions
Why can another periodic table list a different atomic radius?
Atomic size has several definitions, including covalent, metallic and van der Waals radii. Compare like definitions before interpreting a discrepancy.
Are periodic trends perfectly monotonic?
No. Subshell filling and pairing produce exceptions. Use the actual reference values rather than drawing an absolute rule from a trend arrow.