About this experiment
Reverse a magnet, change its strength or replace the second magnet with a material specimen. Measure force across a controlled separation and compare strong permanent-magnet interactions with weak paramagnetic and diamagnetic responses.
Learning goals
- Predict how pole reversal changes permanent-dipole force.
- Compare paramagnetic attraction with diamagnetic repulsion.
- Relate a force-display detection threshold to a nonzero calculated response.
How to use it
- 1Measure the default two-magnet force, then reverse one magnet and compare its sign.
- 2Change separation and test the inverse-fourth-power force dependence of coaxial dipoles.
- 3Replace magnet B with aluminium, copper and the effective iron specimen.
- 4Increase magnet A strength and compare exact calculated force with the 0.1 µN display-resolution threshold.
The model
Assumptions
- Positions are held fixed. Bar lengths and force-arrow lengths are symbolic, and the point-dipole approximation excludes magnet contact.
- The induced specimen volume is 10 cm³. Effective susceptibilities are illustrative values: iron 1, aluminium 2.2×10⁻⁵, copper −1×10⁻⁵, wood −8×10⁻⁶ and plastic −1×10⁻⁵.
- Linear induced magnetization omits hysteresis, remanence, demagnetizing geometry and saturation. The effective iron specimen is not a calibrated real iron sample.
- Forces below 0.1 µN are retained in numerical readouts while marked below the chosen display resolution.
Try this in class
- Q1Why does reversing a permanent magnet reverse the force on another permanent magnet?
- Q2Why does source reversal leave the induced-material force unchanged?
- Q3Can a below-resolution force still be nonzero?
Frequently asked questions
Why do copper, wood and plastic repel weakly?
The selected illustrative susceptibilities are negative, producing a small diamagnetic force away from the stronger field.
Why do the magnets stay in place despite a force?
They are mounted on a virtual fixed-position force bench. Separation is a controlled parameter, so no translational motion is integrated.